Aggregator
AI boom tests GOP’s midterm affordability pitch as price pain spreads
Coffee expert warns one lazy habit can turn your single-serve machine into a germ trap
Who is Hasan Piker? Meet the far-left streamer who is stirring up controversy and dividing Democrats
Kevin O'Leary details massive Utah AI data center to rival China's tech dominance
Republicans scramble to fund Secret Service after Trump assassination attempt amid record-breaking shutdown
King Charles set for historic address to Congress in first US visit as monarch
Top Trump official ignites heated exchange after stumping House Dem on landmark SCOTUS cases
Trump Floats Renaming Agency the Left Hates - and It Just Might Send Them Straight to the Loony Bin
King Charles plans to charm Trump and Congress in high-stakes state visit to the United States: expert
Unabomber investigator reveals likely breaking point of alleged would-be Trump assassin
Red states are not waiting for Congress to pass the SAVE America Act
President Donald Trump continues to prioritize the passage of the SAVE America Act, keeping election integrity at the forefront in Washington. However, states are not waiting for Congress to act. Across the country, this shift has been building for years, and it is becoming harder to ignore.
The SAVE America Act should be passed because it aligns federal elections with the direction states are already taking.
Florida offers one of the clearest examples. Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed a state-level measure requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote and directing officials to verify applicants using existing data systems. The approach mirrors what the SAVE America Act would do at the federal level. DeSantis said the law would “strengthen the security, transparency, and reliability of Florida’s election system.”
Florida is not alone. In Mississippi, Governor Tate Reeves signed the SHIELD Act, which requires officials to verify citizenship when individuals register to vote, including checks against federal databases and regular audits of voter rolls. Reeves called it “another win for election integrity” and made clear that the state intends to keep strengthening its system.
South Dakota has already enacted similar requirements this year, requiring proof of citizenship for new voter registrations and putting those rules into effect immediately. Governor Larry Rhoden said the law “ensures only citizens vote in state elections, keeping our elections safe and secure.”
These bills didn’t happen overnight. States have been moving in this direction for years. Arizona, for example, required proof of citizenship for voter registration following the passage of Arizona Proposition 200, creating a system that distinguishes between voters who provide documentation and those who do not.
That history matters. It shows that the idea of verifying citizenship at the point of registration is nothing new. What is changing now is how widely and directly states are applying it to their election systems.
Under current federal law, voter registration generally relies on applicants affirming their eligibility under penalty of perjury rather than providing documentary proof. The federal voter registration form requires applicants to attest that they are United States citizens under penalty of perjury. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 relies heavily on self-attestation rather than documentary proof, leaving states to determine how verification is carried out. As some states move toward more structured verification, those differences become harder to ignore.
States that have moved toward documentation and data verification are operating alongside systems that still rely primarily on sworn statements.
RELATED: Uncle Sam wants YOU — to obey immigration laws
History/Universal Images Group/Getty Images
The contrast is becoming more visible as more states update their processes, raising a straightforward question about whether federal elections should operate under a consistent standard.
The SAVE America Act answers that problem directly. It would require documentary proof of United States citizenship in order to vote in federal elections, using documents such as a passport or birth certificate.
As Senator Mike Lee has argued, the SAVE America Act would secure federal elections by requiring proof of citizenship and voter identification nationwide.
Citizenship is already required to vote. A federal standard would ensure that requirement is applied the same way in every state.
Without that standard, states will continue moving in different directions, leaving federal elections governed by a patchwork of verification practices. With it, the system becomes consistent.
The SAVE America Act should be passed because it aligns federal elections with the direction states are already taking and applies a clear, uniform standard to voter registration.
States are setting the standard for verifying voter eligibility.
It is time for Congress to do its part and pass the SAVE America Act.
Jihad Rep. Ilhan Omar Schools Us on World War ELEVEN
These evil morons have been given the keys to the kingdom.
NBA guard Terry Rozier may get hit with new charges in alleged gambling scheme
Breaking! United Arab Emirates Leaving OPEC Amid Iran War Fallout
Zelensky Submits Legislation to Extend Martial Law in Ukraine Again
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has submitted legislation to once again extend the decree of martial law, which has been used to suspend elections, ban opposition parties, and shut down media organisations.
The post Zelensky Submits Legislation to Extend Martial Law in Ukraine Again appeared first on Breitbart.
Illegal alien activists are furious at Trump administration after 'cruel' new 'Dreamer' policy drops
The Trump administration has made it easier to deport recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty program implemented by former President Barack Obama, and activists are furious.
Obama said numerous times that he did not have the power to unilaterally pass amnesty for illegal aliens before he announced that he was passing amnesty for illegal aliens in 2012.
'They don't deserve this. We will not stop fighting back against the cruel, anti-immigrant obsession of Trump, Stephen Miller, and their loyalists.'
Fourteen years later, the "Dreamer" immigrants granted amnesty through the DACA program face a heightened threat of deportation.
The decision was made by the Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals of the Department of Justice.
"This decision could have profound consequences for the hundreds of thousands of Dreamers who rely on DACA to live and work in America without threat of deportation," Sen. Dick Durbin (D) of Illinois said. "In the face of this administration's heartless actions, Congress must finally act to protect these young people who know no other home than here. This is a matter of simple American fairness and justice."
Durbin noted in his press release that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested 261 DACA recipients and deported 86 of them since Jan. 2025.
A joint statement from four Democratic senators from the U.S. Congressional Hispanic Caucus also decried the decision.
"Donald Trump said that Dreamers should 'feel safe,' but every action his government takes weakens the DACA program and threatens the safety and livelihoods of the 500,000 DACA recipients who have only ever known this country as home," the senators said.
"Dreamers are our friends and neighbors," they added. "They don't deserve this. We will not stop fighting back against the cruel, anti-immigrant obsession of Trump, Stephen Miller, and their loyalists."
The National Immigration Law Center called the decision "cruel" and warned that it would harm immigrants.
"The Trump administration's proposal to strip DACA recipients' access to affordable health coverage is a huge step backward for the wellbeing of everyone in our communities and further unmasks Trump's transparent and hollow claims to care about 'Dreamers,'" reads an NILC statement.
"This cruel attempt to undo a hard-won victory for immigrant youth would reimpose unnecessary obstacles that for years kept DACA recipients disproportionately uninsured, preventing many of them from getting lifesaving medical care," the group added.
"This decision is yet another step in dismantling the program without the government taking responsibility for ending it outright. ... This is a quiet rollback of protections, and our communities are paying the price in real time," reads a statement from United We Dream.
RELATED: Court rules Obama-era DACA amnesty program unlawful
Durbin estimated that there were about 515,000 people who had been granted DACA status.
Critics have long argued that the original order from Obama to offer amnesty to child arrivals violated the U.S. Constitution by usurping the powers intended to be vested in Congress.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!