Aggregator

At 250, America’s fate is wonderfully unwritten

1 day 13 hours ago


America has a habit of bringing ideas — sometimes others’ ideas — to life. This habit breeds a certain culture of meritocratic, independent superiority, understood by self-made elites and commoners alike, that ideas are a dime a dozen: If you don’t get out there and actually do it, you’re just another dreamer.

I think the most powerful example of this dynamic, and its enduring resonance today, is found in a single line from a single film. In the smash hit 1962 epic “Lawrence of Arabia,” our hero sums up the Western ethos of the ennobled individual will by refusing to let his Arab ally die. Confronted with the dismissive, fatalistic belief that the man’s seemingly inevitable death in the desert is foreordained by God, Lawrence famously snaps back that “nothing is written!” Sure enough, he saves the man, through sheer force of personal grit.

The only true choice is one of freely willed action.

The line was written by British playwright Robert Bolt for British director David Lean in a British production of a British tale of a British officer. Yet, casting our eye across the pond on this landmark national anniversary, we are struck by how lonely America seems today in its insistence on not only the Western principle that a man can, through goodness and greatness, personally break the iron grip of circumstances, but on the proactive living-out of that principle, without which it is but a hollow aspiration.

Our uniquely aggressive, defiant, and self-justifying sense of optimism can, of course, be taken too far; at the extremes, it can lead us to deny that God is always in control and to accept the deaths of millions as a price worth paying for greater power, riches, or renown.

Fate, however, is a pagan concept that can fraudulently enchain a whole people; even a whole world. And the power of even the most ordinary and obscure of men to shatter prideful prognostication through freely willed spiritual sacrifice is richly rooted in great godly obedience.

The paradox of these two ways — that our love of enacted independence can either fulfill or default on our relationship with God — weighs extra heavy upon the soul this 250th year of our land. The chaotic circumstances of our fast-accelerating technologies have opened doors to new expressions of both the healing and damaging versions of our national will to do, not just to think, feel, or be.

For many, simply trying to stay abreast of these developments in the field of AI alone is too bewildering, frustrating, and frightening an effort to maintain. Many who manage to keep roughly current are themselves increasingly pushed for the sake of cognitive stability toward one of the two extreme positions — deifying or demonizing the thing.

Yet the actual state of play is not, in fact, reflective of the urge to feel willfully in control by choosing sides in a crisp, clean, complete, and comprehensive war for all the marbles, then determine the fate of America, the world, and humankind.

As disorienting and destabilizing as it may be, the state of the AI art in America is a riot of competing and conflicting trajectories and tendencies. Between the deifiers and the demonizers is a roiling stew of wildly different factions: open-sourcers, both for and against Chinese tech; closed-sourcers, some pragmatic, some principled; groups in favor of nationalization; groups opposed; groups opposed depending on how much nationalization is on the table; groups opposed depending on who is doing the nationalizing. There are interests pushing for federal preemption of the states, others hammering away at state-level laws either to restrict or enshrine the right to compute, and still others focused simply on playing politics with the issues in the most effective and enriching ways.

RELATED: The backlash against AI reveals it’s a terrible scapegoat

RYGERSZEM/Getty Images

A farrago of federal bills jostles together with a flotilla of regulatory efforts, some but not all flowing from the administration’s executive orders and broader agenda. The Supreme Court is now in the mix. Foreign countries and administrative bodies are striking at American companies, imposing fines and rules of their own. The list goes on.

No single political authority is in control of our national technological situation. No one spiritual authority is recognized as our shared guide. We exist in a moment indescribable as simply democratic, oligarchic, technocratic, fascist, communist, socialist, capitalist, nationalist, populist, anarchic, despotic, or, frankly, anything else. We have the Declaration, we have the Constitution, we have federalism, and we have each other. The rest is remarkably, almost stunningly, up in the air.

We can all sit around and wait for the shoes to drop, and for many, beset by the universal cares of life and the hypnotic glare of tech’s pulsing power, paralysis can seem the only sustainable option. But for many more, even those inclined to choose silence and self-exile over wading into the melee, the only true choice is one of freely willed action. Interpreting technological acceleration as the unfolding of fate itself is a choice, not a cosmic requirement, one that is often made reactively, as cope, rather than proactively, as will to power. What presents as prediction is often actually a bet on the overwhelming power of the past, one that denies human agency and life-bringing newness more than it enables people with skin in the game to manifest their plans.

Rather than freaking out over the AI chaos, we ought to take this memorable opportunity to put our actions where our principles purport to be. Don’t try to game out the scramble of the factions. Don’t try to win prediction roulette, scrying, soothsaying, and scheming a way to strength or safety. Decide with discernment where you can forge a path in a manner that allows you to meet your own gaze in the mirror in the morning. And trust that what is written about us is written on the heart, where we still may pledge our honor, and all that is sacred within, to freely make good on who we have been given to be.

James Poulos

Zohran Mamdani Uses Independence Day Speech to Highlight Plight of Illegal Immigrants

1 day 13 hours ago

New York City's socialist Muslim Mayor Zohran Mamdani used his Independence Day message to highlight the plight of illegal aliens residing in the country, offering a steady stream of misinformation on what is actually happening and turning a blind eye to victims of the actions of illegal immigrants allowed in the country by the Biden administration.

The post Zohran Mamdani Uses Independence Day Speech to Highlight Plight of Illegal Immigrants appeared first on Breitbart.

Hannah Knudsen

WSJ: Burgum Takes Key Role in Trump Agenda

1 day 13 hours ago
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has emerged as one of President Donald Trump's most trusted Cabinet members, serving not only as the nation's top public lands official but also as the president's go-to manager for some of his highest-profile initiatives...

Cato Poll: Nearly Half of Americans Don't Know What 250 Celebrates

1 day 13 hours ago
As the United States prepares to celebrate its 250th anniversary in 2026, a new national survey from the Cato Institute reveals a striking contradiction: nearly half of Americans cannot identify what the milestone commemorates, yet overwhelming majorities remain proud to be...

Rare Declaration Copy Found in UK National Archives

1 day 14 hours ago
A rare copy of the Declaration of Independence from 1776 has been uncovered in the British National Archives after going unnoticed in government records for nearly 250 years, marking a remarkable discovery just as America celebrates its semiquincentennial.

Olympian indicted for allegedly vandalizing Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool — and faces STIFF sentence

1 day 14 hours ago


A U.S. Olympian canoeist who was arrested for allegedly vandalizing the reflecting pool at the Lincoln Memorial has been indicted by a federal grand jury, according to U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro.

David Hearn, 67, willfully and "violently" damaged a 2-square-foot section of the sealant at the pool on June 19 after it was renovated by order of President Donald Trump, according to Pirro.

'By the time I realized what was going on, I was being put in handcuffs.'

"Today a grand jury has returned a felony indictment against a defendant, David Hearn, for felony destruction of property for which he faces 10 years in prison," Pirro said in a media briefing.

She said Hearn admitted to reaching down into the pool and that National Park Service employees observed him forcefully pulling up and removing the bottom liner "with both hands."

A National Park Service employee reportedly told Hearn to stop what he was doing.

"Hearn reacted by shouting at that Parks employee, saying that she cared too much about the reflecting pool," Pirro said.

The witnesses described Hearn's behavior as "belligerent, rude, and disrespectful."

Hearn denied damaging the liner in comments to the Washington Post.

"I didn't vandalize anything," he said. "I didn't destroy or break or peel anything. By the time I realized what was going on, I was being put in handcuffs."

The renovation of the reflecting pool has been mocked by many on the left, but others say it was a necessary and reasonable effort to clean up the monument for the 250th anniversary celebration.

Hearn competed for the U.S. in the 2000 Olympics.

RELATED: Trump greets crew that restored Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool in visit to the White House

"This was a deliberate act to damage the Reflecting Pool at the National Mall that members of the National Park Service actually have worked hard to restore and have witnessed," Pirro said.

She added that there are about six other similar cases being investigated.

"Some of them will be misdemeanors, and some of them could be less, like a violation, but we're reviewing every case based upon the evidence and reviewing all of the reports, and right now it's about another half dozen misdemeanors," Pirro said.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Carlos Garcia

Exclusive — President Donald Trump on Hard-Left Socialist Turn of ‘Dumocrats’: ‘Concept of Give Away Everything Ends up In Squalor, Crime, and Death’

1 day 14 hours ago

President Donald Trump told Breitbart News exclusively that the hard-left radical socialist turn of the modern Democratic Party is dangerous for American citizens, and that throughout history, it always ends up the same way, which is disaster whenever socialism and communism are implemented.

The post Exclusive — President Donald Trump on Hard-Left Socialist Turn of ‘Dumocrats’: ‘Concept of Give Away Everything Ends up In Squalor, Crime, and Death’ appeared first on Breitbart.

Matthew Boyle and Nick Gilbertson