Aggregator
'DON'T TRUST THE POLLS': Failed Democratic candidate melts down after ANOTHER pollster outed as a total fake
Pollsters routinely miss the mark, but some pollsters aren't even trying to hit the target.
Just months after a polling outfit that gave Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) a false sense of momentum was exposed as a fraud — or as they put it, a "short-term social experiment" — another pollster has been outed as a phony.
'Don’t fall for it.'
On Tuesday, the election forecasting website FiftyPlusOne confronted Wedgewood Polls — which claimed on its now-deleted website to be "a nonpartisan, online-panel survey research firm covering competitive U.S. House, Senate, and gubernatorial races nationwide" — with evidence that it had been fabricating data.
The fake pollster immediately dropped the mask, first issuing a statement on social media claiming that it was "an experimental project to demonstrate the vulnerabilities, lack of oversight, and overall low barrier to entry in the modern political polling industry," then reportedly replying to FiftyPlusOne researchers' request for comment with "f**k you."
In its public statement, the fake pollster admitted that there was "no real data behind the vast majority of our releases" and boasted that "our fabricated numbers were given instant credibility across national media platforms — including being cited on air and in reporting by outlets such as MS NOW."
In its coverage earlier this month, MS NOW featured a Wedgewood Poll showing Democrat Jocelyn Benson with a 10-point lead over Republican John James in the Michigan gubernatorial race, reported Mediaite. Blaze News' Poll Watch currently has Benson with a lead of 6.7 points.
"The ease with which unverified figures were absorbed into mainstream political narratives highlights a systemic breakdown in media vetting and data aggregation," said the fake pollster, which claimed that only one of its many surveys was legitimate.
Wedgewood Polls has been turning out bogus data for months — data that have been shared by numerous publications and poll aggregators, including Decision Desk HQ, the Economist, FiftyPlusOne, Poliwave, the New York Times, 270toWin, and VoteHub.
VoteHub, for instance, included data from Wedgewood Polls in a weekly polling rundown on July 29 showing Abdul El-Sayed leading Haley Stevens in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary 46%-39%. The false polling data about Stevens evidently prickled Neera Tanden, the former director of the Biden White House Domestic Policy Council, who expressed disappointment on Tuesday that "a lot of smart people fell for the op."
The New York Times acknowledged on Wednesday that its poll tracker "included 15 polls released by Wedgewood between June and October, some of which included multiple races."
Decision Desk HQ included at least 17 of Wedgewood's phony polls on its race-level polling lists and averages.
While Decision Desk HQ claimed that removing the polls has "not changed the projected seat totals or chamber control probabilities in the Senate or House," the removal has for other outlets proven consequential.
When the Economist removed Wedgewood's polls from its model, their results shifted in "a handful of races." For example, "Democrats' win probability in the Mississippi Senate race fell from 7.1% to 5.5%," said the Economist.
BlazeTV host Steve Deace wrote, "Keep this in mind regarding the Wedgewood fake polling scam. Way back in June, Wedgewood missed the winner of the Louisiana Republican Senate primary by 18 points. 18. points. And yet months later, elite corporate media kept promoting their fake polls anyway."
Republican Rep. Julia Letlow beat state Treasurer John Fleming 56.9% to 43.1% in the Louisiana Senate primary runoff in June. Wedgewood released a poll on June 25 showing Fleming leading Letlow 51%-47%.
Republican Rep. Abe Hamadeh (Ariz.) said of the revelation about the fake pollster, "Everything is fake! Smile and touch grass — enjoy reality and enjoy the show!"
Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts noted, "This is the second left-wing polling psy-op exposed during this election cycle. There is a coordinated effort to demoralize conservative voters and keep them away from the polls. Don’t fall for it. Your ballot is the only poll that ultimately matters. Go vote."
Mallory McMorrow, the Michigan state senator who ran for U.S. Senate and unofficially withdrew from the Aug. 4 Democratic primary after trailing in distant third place to El-Sayed and Stevens, attributes some of the blame for the death of her campaign on a fake Wedgewood poll. She claimed Tuesday night that the late June poll showing her with only 9% adversely impacted donations and volunteer morale and prompted calls for her to drop out of the race.
"Sure, a point was proven. Polling is broken," wrote McMorrow. "But tens of thousands of people poured their hearts, time, energy, hard-earned money into something they believed in — for a year-and-a-half, and it was treated like a game. Our volunteers gave their all. And then some. I felt like I had let so many of them down."
"If this teaches us anything — DON'T GET COMPLACENT AND DON'T TRUST THE POLLS," added McMorrow.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Ilhan Omar finally emerges after DC raid with video pleading for cash to fight Trump
Titans player Jordan Elliott got angry at teammate, went to his car for a gun and ended up unemployed
EXCLUSIVE: California Voters Turn Against Core DSA Policy, Poll Finds
Polling Firm Admits to Fake Data, Says It Was 'Social Experiment'
Wedgewood Polls posted on X Tuesday night that it fabricated its data throughout the 2026 election cycle, claiming it was done as a "social experiment" intended to spark reform of the industry.
The post Polling Firm Admits to Fake Data, Says It Was ‘Social Experiment’ appeared first on Breitbart.
You Can't Make This Up (but They Did): Polling Firm Admits Fabricating Election Results
Nolte: Netflix Hit with Four Quarters of Declining Growth
On Tuesday, Netflix reported that its growth had slowed for the fourth quarter in a row.
The post Nolte: Netflix Hit with Four Quarters of Declining Growth appeared first on Breitbart.
Secret sex video rocks University of North Carolina at Charlotte fraternity, 1 arrested: Police
This May Be It: Putin Agrees to Peace Talks, Zelensky Open to Deal That Freezes Lines
Slain New Jersey mom's autopsy report released months after stabbing death at home: report
LeBron James curses out Knicks fan in heated exchange: 'I don't know what the f--- you talking about'
Democrat Abdul El-Sayed: Second Amendment Protects 'Equal Rights to a Musket'
At a town hall in Midland, Michigan, on Saturday, Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed (D) said the 2nd Amendment boils down to protecting "equal rights to a musket."
The post Democrat Abdul El-Sayed: Second Amendment Protects ‘Equal Rights to a Musket’ appeared first on Breitbart.
Americans Who Moved To Europe Share Their Immediate Regret, Horror
A Curious Thing Happened to Somali Politician's 'Deep Fake' Claim in Upside-Down Flag Controversy
Why political texts keep coming even after you block them
GM killed the oil dipstick. That's not progress.
When you pop the hood of a new pickup truck, there's something you won't find any more: the oil dipstick.
General Motors has confirmed that its new sixth-generation 5.7-liter and 6.6-liter V8 engines, coming to the 2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500, will no longer have a conventional dipstick. Instead, drivers will check the oil level on a digital display inside the truck.
I still check my tires with a pressure gauge, even though my vehicles have tire-pressure monitoring systems.
I've been working on cars for decades, and I think this is a mistake.
Checking your oil is one of the simplest and most important things you can do to protect your engine. You pull out the dipstick, wipe it clean, reinsert it, and pull it out again. In seconds, you know whether your engine has enough oil. You can also see what the oil looks like.
You don't need to start the engine, navigate a touchscreen, or trust a sensor.
What's wrong with the old-fashioned way?GM claims its new electronic system is designed to simplify ownership. It monitors oil levels, warns drivers when they're too low or too high, and even tells them how much oil to add.
And according to a GM engineer interviewed by Pickup Truck + SUV Talk, packaging was part of the decision: Additional fuel-injection hardware made it difficult to accommodate a traditional dipstick tube.
But here's my problem. When do you most want to check your oil? Before you start the engine.
The 2027 Silverado owner's manual instructs drivers to park on level ground, leave the engine idling at normal operating temperature, and select the oil-level display on the infotainment screen.
Think about that. You have to run the engine before you can perform a manual oil-level check.
My co-host on "The Drive," automotive analyst Karl Brauer, has dealt with this problem firsthand. His 2009 and 2012 Porsche 911s had electronic oil-level systems that required him to warm up the engine, park on level ground, and work through a series of menus.
Karl raised a question during a recent episode that gets right to the heart of the problem: What if your engine develops an oil leak overnight?
Suppose a gasket fails and oil drains out while your truck is parked. With a dipstick, you can check the level immediately, before starting the engine.
GM says its electronic system automatically warns drivers about low oil. But the owner's manual requires a warm, running engine for an accurate manual oil-level reading. Whether the system can warn you about oil lost overnight before you start the engine remains unclear.
I would prefer to have a dipstick so I can check for myself.
RELATED: BLINDED BY THE LIGHTS: Can Washington finally save American drivers from headlight hell?
NurPhote/Getty Images
Sensors aren't infallibleI have owned vehicles with electronic oil-level systems, including an Audi RS5, and I didn't like giving up that simple mechanical check.
Karl also recalled owning older BMWs that repeatedly displayed low-oil warnings even though the oil level was fine. The sensor was the problem.
A malfunctioning sensor can give you a false alarm. The more troubling possibility is a faulty reading that fails to alert you to a genuine problem.
That doesn't mean GM's new system is unreliable. The technology hasn't been in customers' hands long enough to establish that. But an electronic sensor introduces another component that can fail, and there is no longer a physical dipstick to double-check it.
Know what's under your hoodI'm a firm believer that every driver should understand the basics of vehicle maintenance.
Before my children started driving, I made sure they knew how to check their oil, tire pressure, and other essential fluids. I wanted them to understand what was happening mechanically rather than simply waiting for a warning light.
I still check my tires with a pressure gauge, even though my vehicles have tire-pressure monitoring systems. I compare the reading with the recommended pressure on the driver's doorjamb.
Technology can be an excellent backup. But I don't want it to be my only source of information.
To be clear, GM isn't eliminating the dipstick from every 2027 Silverado and Sierra. The 2.7-liter TurboMax four-cylinder and 3.0-liter Duramax diesel will retain theirs. It's the new V8s that lose the familiar yellow-handled tool.
Maybe the electronic system will prove to be convenient and reliable. I certainly hope so.
But I have to wonder what we have really gained by eliminating a device that costs very little, rarely fails, and lets an owner check a critical engine fluid without even turning the key.
Sometimes the simplest technology is still the best.
Thune makes bold prediction about Republicans' Senate chances as GOP pulls millions from key races
Omar Emerges in TikTok Video That May Reveal Where She Is
Nolte: Axios Uses Fake AI Image to Run Damage Control for Somali Politician Who Spoke Next to Upside-Down Flag
To defend a leftist politician who spoke in front of an upside-down American flag, Axios published a fake fact check claiming the video was “doctored” by AI and that, in reality, the flag was right side up.
The post Nolte: Axios Uses Fake AI Image to Run Damage Control for Somali Politician Who Spoke Next to Upside-Down Flag appeared first on Breitbart.