Taking a pause in the heat of the midterms to check on the health of children.

Conservatives must speak up.

He is prone to zig and zag, but there are unfortunate consistencies when it comes to Russia and Ukraine.

In four states, voters will have the chance to take a stand on abortion.

Protecting seniors from poverty is not the same as providing six-figure benefits to the highest-income households.

To secure the next American century, the two countries need to build a joint venture based on tech and defense innovation.

Since 1950, the National Book Awards — now overseen by the National Book Foundation — has recognized the best in American literary talent, honoring the likes of Ralph Ellison, William Faulkner, Flannery O'Connor, and J.D. Salinger.

In recent years, however, the foundation's judges appear to have prized politics over quality, at least in the category of nonfiction.

'The National Book Award has become a DEI checklist.'

In 2023, for example, the award went to an Indian activist's "retelling of U.S. history." In 2024, the prize went to a book that the foundation said "holds the U.S. to account for its cruelty." Last year, the foundation's handpicked judges gave the nonfiction award to an Egyptian-born critic for his long-winded attack on the West.

Among the titles longlisted for this year's award in the category of nonfiction is a work of agitprop about the supposed evils of white paint — a book which Steven Tucker, writing for the Federalist, noted was ironically printed on white paper.

Book publisher Simon & Schuster says in its description of "A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint" by Columbia University associate professor Wendy Walters:

As the default color of our built environment, [white paint] asks us to believe that it’s neutral — that it has no signifiers or, perhaps more troublingly, that what it does signify, whether it be calmness, cleanliness, blankness, or purity, is unassailable and value-free. In this expansive, impassioned examination, cultural critic Wendy S. Walters interrogates all that we have taken for granted about the substance that colors, or fails to color, the structures and objects that surround us."

The race-obsessed author said in a 2021 video for Creative Capital — the outfit that gave her a grant to write the book — that her anti-white project "comes from a genuine and visceral dislike of white paint, a feeling that is at times overwhelming for me, and according to the estimations of others I know, a reaction that is possibly irrational."

When probing her "possibly irrational" dislike of the color white and use of white paint, Walters supposedly "discovered numerous examples of the way that it figured into systems of erasure, exclusion, violence, and the masking of power in the social and natural world."

RELATED: Three straight white guys walk into a poetry reading ...

Derek Davis/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

Walters complained about an instance where white paint was allegedly used by supremacists to deface Houston's Rothko Chapel and another instance where a rainbow crosswalk in Canada was painted over in white.

Ex-Washington Post book critic Ron Charles noted in his review of Walters' book, "At times, it feels as though Walters selected the entire world and typed Command-F 'white.'"

"Early on, she claims, 'This is a book about white paint, not about whiteness,'" Charles continued. "But that’s like claiming Moby-Dick is about whales, not about obsession."

Walters has a son with her white husband, author Dan Charnas, but she still managed to crowd around 350 white pages with justification for her hatred of white paint.

While this lengthy justification was panned in a New York Times book review on Thursday, it may ultimately be awarded next month by National Book Foundation judges.

Walters' placement on the National Book Awards' 2026 longlist is par for the course.

New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote in late September, "By my count, in the past decade, nine of the 10 winners of the National Book Award for fiction belonged to a minority group. In the nonfiction category, 10 of 10. Bluntly, the National Book Award has become a DEI checklist: Only authors with preferred identities, preferred topics, and preferred politics stand any realistic chance of winning."

Blaze News did not immediately receive a response from Walters or her publisher.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Kalen DeBoer's Alabama squad fell 26-10 at Tennessee, and now the Vols owe a $500,000 SEC field storming fine to their hated rival's program.

French President Emmanuel Macron touched down in Kuwait on Monday morning to begin a three-day tour of the Gulf, thus fleeing a country being torn apart by riots and civil unrest.

The post Macron Bids ‘Au Revoir’ to Burning France, Flees to Kuwait for Middle East Tour appeared first on Breitbart.

The Los Angeles Rams have delivered one disappointing performance after another so far in a season they were expected to be Super Bowl favorites

Prince Harry's reported Princess Diana documentary plans could derail reconciliation with Prince William, royal experts warn of deepening rift.

Compass Datacenters CEO Chris Crosby says the data center boom is fueling blue-collar jobs for electricians, mechanics and technicians in Red Oak, Texas.

Metallica Rose Harrison could face the death penalty for the Great Wolf Lodge killings, but a private investigator says key legal hurdles remain.

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu says he has instructed prefects to impose "very limited" and "localized" curfews in cities to prevent more rioting and looting, following this weekend's violence that notably targeted city halls...

A post-workout protein shake that Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson swears by packs 70 grams of protein powder, creatine and a surprising rice ingredient into one smoothie.

In June, the Veterans of Foreign Wars celebrated the left-wing holy of holies: LGBTQIA+ month. They paid tribute to those who fall under the ever-expanding umbrella of sexual identities and genders.

Framed as a gesture of inclusivity, the decision instead placed the VFW squarely on the opposing side of the demographic it has served for more than 125 years.

Having the right to say something does not automatically make saying it a good strategic decision.

Much of my career has been centered on reputation management and communications strategy. A painful lesson to learn the hard way is that the quickest way to lose influence is to pick unnecessary fights with your allies.

If the fight isn’t in defense of your core mission or identity, why go there and risk losing your base?

Every organization has a God-given right to say what it wants, when it wants. But the VFW seems to have forgotten something important about its members. According to Pew Research, 63% of veteran voters identify with or lean toward the Republican Party, compared with 35% who support Democrats.

Veterans are Americans. They fought for freedom, including the freedom of people whose beliefs and identities are different from their own. That does not mean they have to enthusiastically embrace every cause associated with the modern Pride movement or accept being branded intolerant and backward for questioning its politics.

Many veterans have legitimate concerns about taxpayer-funded gender-transition procedures, ideological brainwashing in classrooms, and military policies that could affect national security. By wading into this controversy, the VFW risks alienating its membership and its most important public policy audience: the GOP.

That is a spectacularly unnecessary political gamble, especially in an election year. The VFW could end up paying dearly if more disillusioned veterans decide to tear up their membership cards.

The VFW does not have to embrace every socially conservative position, nor should it abandon veterans who are not a part of its conservative majority. It should recognize that picking sides in contentious cultural debates carries risks, particularly when its overriding responsibility is to secure practical benefits for veterans.

Unfortunately, the communications problems extend well beyond Pride Month.

The organization has also managed to find itself in an extraordinary confrontation with Republican lawmakers over the Take Care of America’s Veterans Act, a sweeping legislative package combining more than 60 veterans-related measures.

The legislation would improve access to health care, expand support for caregivers, strengthen suicide prevention programs, and address longstanding problems within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

These are the exact issues the VFW exists to champion.

RELATED: The CDC is hiding the data on armed citizens

James Carroll/Getty Images

A Mission Roll Call survey found that approximately 71% of respondents supported TCAVA.

Its concerns are not entirely without merit. Veterans deserve fair compensation for service-connected conditions, and any proposal affecting future benefits warrants careful scrutiny. But why scuttle a sweeping package of potentially transformative reforms over provisions that could be amended?

Surely the sensible response is to fight for a better bill rather than risk throwing the whole thing onto the legislative scrap heap. Instead, the dispute has descended into a damaging public confrontation.

In July, Republican Representatives Mike Bost (Ill.) and Jack Bergman (Mich.) requested a Department of Veterans Affairs review of the VFW’s accreditation to assist veterans with benefits claims.

The VFW has every right to challenge politicians. Its independence is vital, and lawmakers should not threaten its accreditation simply because they dislike its position on legislation.

But having the right to say something does not automatically make saying it a good strategic decision. The VFW should be hammering out compromises, winning amendments, and building coalitions.

Instead, it is flying the flag of a movement many of its members oppose and getting involved in ugly public feuds with folks who are supposed to be on the same side. Who benefits from that? Certainly not the veterans waiting for better health care, improved benefits, and meaningful reform.

The VFW’s history deserves respect. Generations of veterans have depended on its advocacy, and its influence in Washington once helped secure important victories for those who courageously served their country.

That makes its current predicament all the more frustrating.

With Republicans controlling Washington at the moment, there is a golden opportunity to secure meaningful legislative victories. The VFW needs to stop fighting unnecessary battles and concentrate its firepower on the issues that really matter.

Three National Guard members returned fire after a suspect allegedly opened fire during a confrontation in Washington, D.C., police said. Two people were wounded.

A car hit an Australian federal independent lawmaker on Monday, critically injuring her in a potentially deliberate act, police said. The driver was arrested. Helen Haines, 65, was struck by a Toyota Land Cruiser SUV outside her electoral district office...

Israeli police said they arrested 10 people on Monday in connection with a wave of settler violence that included attacks on a foreign journalist and European diplomats in the occupied West Bank over the weekend.

Trump's approval below 40% and inflation concerns fuel Democratic momentum, but Republicans retain cash advantages ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.