Aggregator
Questions swirl after IDF claims to have replaced crucifix its soldier destroyed
The Israel Defense Forces may have more explaining to do after one of its soldiers destroyed a crucifix with a sledgehammer in Debel, Lebanon, as more than half a dozen others looked on.
While the IDF tried to resolve the incident with a series of social media posts, more details have emerged in the aftermath of this story, raising more questions about the IDF's account.
'Are they playing us?'
Following the incident, the IDF announced that both the soldier who filmed the incident and the soldier who destroyed the crucifix would be jailed for 30 days, and the onlookers would be questioned. The IDF also posted a still photo of the supposed replacement crucifix that it claimed to have helped provide.
However, a conflicting version of events has emerged.
RELATED: IDF soldier caught smashing Jesus statue with sledgehammer — officials and critics react
Debel Municipality Facebook account
Photos posted to the X account called Hillbilly Catholic on Wednesday afternoon went viral, and the messages accompanying the photos claimed that the Italian forces of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon had replaced the crucifix.
Among those pictured in the photos are several soldiers with Italian flags on their uniforms that seem to match that of U.N. personnel, a few priests, and what appears to be the apostolic nuncio to Lebanon, Bishop Paolo Borgia.
In another post, Hillbilly Catholic included a screenshot of the IDF's post with the crucifix it claimed "replaced" the one its soldiers had destroyed. The crucifixes in the IDF post and the Hillbilly Catholic posts differ in shape, color, detail, and style.
"Are they playing us?" Hillbilly Catholic asked.
The photographs posted by Hillbilly Catholic were part of a larger set of photos and video from what appears to be a local Debel account on Facebook called Debel Alerts.
On Tuesday, Debel Alerts made a post claiming an Italian priest named Father Claudio was coordinating with UNIFIL Commander General Diodato Abagnara to replace the crucifix in its original spot. The post added that Father Claudio revealed that "a gesture of support" was on its way from UNIFIL and expected to arrive within 48 hours.
There is also a video on the Debel Alerts' timeline of the new crucifix statue being transferred.
Debel Municipality
On Wednesday, Debel Alerts posted several photos of the installation of the new crucifix with the help of UNIFIL. The photos show soldiers and priests standing side by side in front of the newly installed crucifix statue.
The new crucifix also appears to have been placed in the exact spot where the old one was destroyed, a comparison of the surroundings revealed.
An official account called Debel Municipality posted more photos confirming Bishop Paolo Borgia's presence during the procession and installation of the new crucifix.
However, this account also revealed something unexpected.
Some online users scoffed at the IDF's post of the new crucifix, claiming that the crucifix looked like a small wall crucifix or that the photo was manipulated.
Yet Debel Municipality posted a photo of what appears to be that crucifix during the procession. A man can be seen standing next to some priests and behind some servers while holding the much smaller crucifix that appeared in the IDF's post.
Debel Municipality
While this photo seems to debunk the claims that the IDF's post was fake or manipulated, other questions remain.
First, neither Debel Alerts nor Debel Municipality make any mention of the IDF's alleged efforts to help replace the crucifix, despite the IDF's claim that "Northern Command worked to coordinate the replacement of the statue from the moment it received the report of the incident."
Similarly, the IDF did not make any mention of UNIFIL's role nor Bishop Paolo Borgia's presence in the town this week, despite their clear roles in the project.
Further, the IDF's "replacement" is not the actual replacement. The crucifix that UNIFIL apparently provided was placed in the same place as the old one and has a similar size and style, while the IDF one, though apparently real, is significantly smaller and not installed in the same place.
Finally, the IDF has not posted any follow-up with a photo of the other crucifix that UNIFIL helped replace, suggesting that the other, smaller crucifix is the only "replacement" they are claiming to have helped with. It is not clear whether the IDF actually provided the smaller crucifix to the community, despite its claim.
Blaze News contacted the IDF, UNIFIL, Debel Municipality, and the Nunciature of Lebanon via the Vatican Press Office but did not immediately receive a response.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
DOJ charges 2 Chinese nationals who allegedly ran overseas cryptocurrency scam center targeting Americans
Sigh. Four GOP Senators Doom Sen. John Kennedy's SAVE America Act Fix
Fetterman slams ‘Retaliatory’ Va. Redistricting: ‘Everyone loses at this point’
BOMBSHELL: The DOJ Has Now CONFIRMED That The Biden Admin Was In Full Command Of The SPLC While They Were Funding Every Nazi Organization In America!
Pakistan Praises Trump for Extending Ceasefire, Puts Pressure on Iran to Talk
The interior minister of Pakistan, Mohsin Naqvi, held a meeting on Thursday with American Ambassador Natalie Baker to discuss attempts to continue negotiations to settle the war in Iran, expressing hope upon leaving the meeting that the rogue Iranian terror regime would return to the negotiating table.
The post Pakistan Praises Trump for Extending Ceasefire, Puts Pressure on Iran to Talk appeared first on Breitbart.
WATCH -- 'F**k You, Loser': Leftist Protesters, Students Disrupt DHS Lawyer's Speech at UCLA
Leftist activists and students disrupted an event with U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorney James Percival on Tuesday at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
The post WATCH — ‘F**k You, Loser’: Leftist Protesters, Students Disrupt DHS Lawyer’s Speech at UCLA appeared first on Breitbart.
The FBI should get a warrant before reading your messages
Conservatives have spent decades fighting government overreach. We have opposed IRS targeting of Tea Party groups, regulatory power-grabs, and agencies that treat the Bill of Rights as a suggestion. So explain this: Why are Republican leaders in Congress lining up to renew a surveillance law that lets the FBI read Americans' private communications without asking a judge? Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act expires on April 30. Intelligence agencies want an 18-month clean extension — no changes, no reforms, no warrant requirement. The intelligence community has joined former Biden administration officials in making the rounds on Capitol Hill, pressing members of Congress to fall in line.
Some of us are standing up for the Fourth Amendment by demanding, at the very least, fair votes on real civil liberties protections. Some are not, demanding that we shut up and not only reauthorize this powerful spying power, but also deny Americans a chance to see how their representatives in Congress vote on an issue that enjoys overwhelming, bipartisan support from their constituents.
Conservatives who believe January 6 defendants were treated unjustly by a politicized Department of Justice should be the first to demand a warrant requirement — because Section 702 is one of the laws that was wrongly used to go after those Americans.
Here's what a "clean" reauthorization actually means. The government collects the communications of foreign targets overseas — emails, texts, calls. That part is unobjectionable. Foreigners have no Fourth Amendment rights. The problem is what happens next. When those foreign targets communicate with Americans, those American messages get swept into the database too — hundreds of millions of them. And then the FBI can search through those communications using your name or email address — with no warrant, no judge, and no probable cause. This is the "backdoor search." This is not a hypothetical concern. In a single reporting period, the government conducted 278,000 searches that violated the rules. From 2018 to 2024, federal law required a warrant before the FBI could conduct backdoor searches in certain criminal cases. The bureau ran dozens of qualifying searches during that window. It obtained the required court order zero times.
Conservatives who believe January 6 defendants were treated unjustly by a politicized Department of Justice should be the first to demand a warrant requirement — because Section 702 is one of the laws that was wrongly used to go after those Americans.
RELATED: GOP hard-liners derail government's spying power despite pressure from Trump
cbies/Getty Images
Congress responded in 2024 by passing minor reforms that mostly codified then-current practice — RISAA — which is to say Congress put into law the same rules that had already led to significant misuse. The FBI's response was to quietly use a separate querying tool that bypassed those requirements. By March 2026, the FISA Court issued a classified opinion that found the issue spanned the entire intelligence community. And it isn’t just the FBI. We still don’t know whether the NSA analyst who searched Section 702 data for information about online dating matches kept his security clearance or job.
The fix is straightforward. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) has introduced the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, while Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), and a bipartisan coalition have introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act, both of which require a warrant before the FBI can access an American's private communications collected under Section 702. Conservative members blocked the clean reauthorization not to make FISA reauthorization impossible, but to create a path forward for a version that does not unjustly violate Americans’ privacy.
The argument that we must choose between national security and the warrant requirement is false. Warrants do not prevent surveillance. They require the government to convince a judge that the surveillance is justified, as the Constitution requires. Government agencies that cannot meet that standard are fishing — for you.
'Hero' father drowns saving his 12-year-old son from rip current at popular beach destination, family says
Wowsers: House Ethics Committee Targeted North Carolina Democrat in Investigation No One Saw Coming
Travis Hunter's wife Leanna Lenee has a warning for WAGs heading into the 2026 NFL Draft
VITAL INTEL: The Globalists Are Secretly Preparing For A Planetary Collapse Of The Earth’s Magnetic Fields That Will Lead To A Massive Extinction Event In The Near Future, Warns Respected Scientist Dr. Jack Kruse!
Ships seized by Iranians 'armed to the teeth' along Strait of Hormuz have been taken toward port: report
Senior DHS Counterterrorism Official Suspended Over Sugar Daddy Scandal - 'She's Horny'
Scientists uncover identity of mysterious 'golden orb' discovered miles underwater in 2023
Catching your wife in bed with the neighbor took the fun out of swinging, and how soon is too soon to move on?
Common sweetener may trigger fat buildup in ways experts didn’t expect
DOJ Indictment Puts SPLC’s Massive War Chest Under the Microscope
Trump Effect: Hiring Is Accelerating and Layoffs Are Near Historic Lows, Suggesting A Strong April Jobs Report
Layoffs are near the lowest they have been in decades and hiring is accelerating.
The post Trump Effect: Hiring Is Accelerating and Layoffs Are Near Historic Lows, Suggesting A Strong April Jobs Report appeared first on Breitbart.